Difference between revisions of "Agile"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "See http://agilemanifesto.org/ and wp:Agile software development") |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
See http://agilemanifesto.org/ | See http://agilemanifesto.org/ | ||
and [[wp:Agile software development|Agile software development]] | and [[wp:Agile software development|Agile software development]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | In sum, ''agility'' is good. Agile as a noun was never intended by those who started it all<ref>https://pragdave.me/blog/2014/03/04/time-to-kill-agile/</ref>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Good Reads == | ||
+ | * You MUST read [https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/agile-dead-matthew-kern Agile is Dead] by Matthew Kern | ||
+ | * [http://rubiquity.com/2014/03/12/agile-is-dead-angry-developer.html Agile is Dead - the Angry Developer version] (short) | ||
+ | * [https://www.disciplinedagileconsortium.org/resources/documents/beyondscrum.pdf Disciplined Agile Development] (Beyond Scrum) | ||
+ | * [http://www.disciplinedagiledelivery.com/lifecycle/ Disciplined Agile Delivery] promotes repeatable results over repeatable processes. | ||
+ | * [https://medium.com/deconstructing-agile/deconstructing-agile-the-language-of-agile-is-broken-e0b60ba28901#.s2uw8gt0u Agile terminology is broken] | ||
+ | * [https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/agility-maturity-matthew-kern-msea-cea-pmp-itil-cissp-issap Agility v. Maturity] by Matthew Kern discusses Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{References}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Illustrations == | ||
+ | [[File:Disciplined-agile-lifecycle-advanced11.jpg|thumb|left|400px|One of many lifecycles possible in Disciplined Agile Delivery]] | ||
+ | [[File:Characteristics of Capability Maturity Model.svg|thumb|400px|right|Characteristics of the Maturity levels in CMMI]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Project Management]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Development]] |
Latest revision as of 13:59, 26 April 2016
See http://agilemanifesto.org/ and Agile software development
In sum, agility is good. Agile as a noun was never intended by those who started it all[1].
Good Reads[edit | edit source]
- You MUST read Agile is Dead by Matthew Kern
- Agile is Dead - the Angry Developer version (short)
- Disciplined Agile Development (Beyond Scrum)
- Disciplined Agile Delivery promotes repeatable results over repeatable processes.
- Agile terminology is broken
- Agility v. Maturity by Matthew Kern discusses Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI)
References[edit source]