Difference between revisions of "Chat"
m (fix links) |
m (added Category:Software using HotCat) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Will Mattermost become the ground-breaking leader in free chat? What do you think? What do you use for team chat? Are there any FLOSS projects that are well developed, but not owned? [https://jitsi.org/ Jitsi] is/was apparently pretty complete, but is now owned by Atlassian (which means watch 'features' disappear or new 'features' which make it tightly coupled with other Atlassian products). | Will Mattermost become the ground-breaking leader in free chat? What do you think? What do you use for team chat? Are there any FLOSS projects that are well developed, but not owned? [https://jitsi.org/ Jitsi] is/was apparently pretty complete, but is now owned by Atlassian (which means watch 'features' disappear or new 'features' which make it tightly coupled with other Atlassian products). | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Collaboration]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Tools]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Software]] | ||
Latest revision as of 10:51, 7 February 2017
Instant Messaging, commonly referred to as simply chat has a long history on the Internet. Today, due to major advancements in all aspects of technology, the distinction between chat, video conferencing and voice communications is blurred.
It's remarkable that IRC still exists after all these years. Mostly because it's free as in freedom, and 'simple' in terms of features which makes it so interoperable and flexible. It has it's limitations to be sure, and quite a while ago I thought there were things like Jabber/XMPP that would take over because of the capabilities of the protocols [1] were maturing at the same time that legal issues were forcing interoperability.
But today there is no single "killer app" for Instant Messaging [2]. (The same is true for Video Conferencing, but that's another topic.) By "killer app" I mean a platform that teams can either join (distributed) or setup for themselves; a game-changer and leader, like the Apache HTTPD server. I do not mean a FLOSS client, such as pidgin, that can allow you to connect to a proprietary network -- because the emphasis is on what platform can the whole team share?
Slack has been quite popular. I've never used it, and I'm only interested in FLOSS platforms. I have no interest in a proprietary platform.
I just learned that the CiviCRM team is using "Mattermost" [3] which has a compelling story behind it [4] and is for the time being partly open. Sadly, it could go the way of countless other 'open source' projects due to the fact that it's licensed under the Apache license. Basically, Mattermost could abandon the community edition once significant revenue makes the community version irrelevant to their business.
As an aside, I don't quite understand why they are offering the community edition under a dual Apache/GNU Affero license. [5]
Will Mattermost become the ground-breaking leader in free chat? What do you think? What do you use for team chat? Are there any FLOSS projects that are well developed, but not owned? Jitsi is/was apparently pretty complete, but is now owned by Atlassian (which means watch 'features' disappear or new 'features' which make it tightly coupled with other Atlassian products).
- ↑ wp:Comparison of instant messaging protocols
- ↑ Prism-break.org has a great directory of free software including a category on Instant Messaging: https://prism-break.org/en/categories/gnu-linux/#instant-messaging
- ↑ https://civicrm.org/blog/michael-mcandrew/chat-infrastructure-for-civicrm
- ↑ http://www.mattermost.org/why-we-made-mattermost-an-open-source-slack-alternative/
- ↑ https://github.com/mattermost/platform/blob/master/LICENSE.txt
