Difference between revisions of "Git"

From Freephile Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Documentation: adds a couple good reference links)
(remove template)
 
(32 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The Git system (http://git-scm.com/) was originally developed by Linus Torvalds as a distributed version control system to replace BitKeeper for the Linux Kernel project
+
The [[mw:Git (software)|Git]] system (http://git-scm.com/) was originally developed by Linus Torvalds as a distributed version control system to replace '''BitKeeper''' for the Linux Kernel project
 +
 
 +
The bottom line is this: modern software development may take many "forms", but it usually boils down to [http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/ this].  Git enables such a branched workflow. That is why distributed version control in general, and git in particular, is the most widely adopted version control system for software development <ref>https://ianskerrett.wordpress.com/2014/06/23/eclipse-community-survey-2014-results/</ref>
 +
 
 +
See [[Git/hacks]] for example commands
  
 
== Intro to Git ==
 
== Intro to Git ==
  
The IIC has a new git repository hosting service.<br />
+
Greg Rundlett setup git repository hosting services at the IIC (http://svn.iic.harvard.edu/gitweb/)
You can browse our git repositories at http://svn.iic.harvard.edu/gitweb/
 
  
 
Why do we have git?  Because [http://whygitisbetterthanx.com Git is better than X]  Now that we have the "My DVCS is better than your DVCS" argument out of the way, you can actually get some valuable insights from that website if you are interested in comparing Git with Mercurial, Bazaar, Subversion or Perforce.  If I had to single out one primary advantage of Git, it would be that it actually features branching and merging.
 
Why do we have git?  Because [http://whygitisbetterthanx.com Git is better than X]  Now that we have the "My DVCS is better than your DVCS" argument out of the way, you can actually get some valuable insights from that website if you are interested in comparing Git with Mercurial, Bazaar, Subversion or Perforce.  If I had to single out one primary advantage of Git, it would be that it actually features branching and merging.
  
Repo visibility is completely customizable, as are individual permissions to write to repos.  I've installed a system called gitosis to handle the privileges through a special git repository. It uses Public Key cryptography rather than granting SSH accounts to everyone.  This makes it really easy to do your work securely without even needing a password.  For the curious, the actual mechanics of gitosis are detailed at [http://scie.nti.st/2007/11/14/hosting-git-repositories-the-easy-and-secure-way scie.nti.st]
+
Repo visibility is completely customizable, as are individual permissions to write to repos.  I've installed a system called gitosis to handle the privileges through a special git repository. It uses Public Key cryptography rather than granting SSH accounts to everyone.  This makes it really easy to do your work securely without even needing a password.  For the curious, the actual mechanics of gitosis are detailed at [http://scie.nti.st/2007/11/14/hosting-git-repositories-the-easy-and-secure-way scie.nti.st]. Although that link may still work, there is also https://git-scm.com/book/en/v1/Git-on-the-Server-Gitosis.
  
 
{{Messagebox |
 
{{Messagebox |
Line 16: Line 19:
 
To host a public repo, go to http://github.com
 
To host a public repo, go to http://github.com
 
}}
 
}}
 +
 +
You might want to read about how we [[Git/migrating to git|migrate from Subversion to Git]] or how [http://julienrenaux.fr/2014/02/28/leading-the-svn-to-git-migration/ others have done it]
 +
 +
== Initial Configuration ==
 +
In your [https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Getting-Started-First-Time-Git-Setup first time setting up Git on a new computer], you want to configure your username and email among other settings.
 +
<source lang="bash">
 +
git config --global user.name "Greg Rundlett"
 +
git config --global user.email greg@freephile.com
 +
git config --global core.editor vim
 +
git config --global diff.tool meld
 +
git config --global --add color.ui true
 +
# store password in memory for an hour
 +
git config --global credential.helper 'cache --timeout=3600'
 +
 +
 +
# recent packaged versions of git might be 1.8.3.1 (CentOS 7.4) whereas the current available is 2.15.1
 +
# push.default is unset; its implicit value is changing in
 +
# Git 2.0 from 'matching' to 'simple'. To squelch this message
 +
# and adopt the new behavior now, use:
 +
git config --global push.default simple
 +
</source>
 +
=== Example .gitconfig ===
 +
<code>git config --global -e</code> and paste in the following:
 +
<source lang="ini">
 +
[user]
 +
        name = Greg Rundlett
 +
        email = greg@freephile.com
 +
 +
[alias]
 +
        co = checkout
 +
        ci = commit
 +
        unstage = reset HEAD
 +
        wu = log --stat origin..@{0}
 +
        wup = log -p origin..@{0}
 +
        lg = log --graph --pretty=format:'%Cred%h%Creset -%C(yellow)%d%Creset %s %Cgreen(%cr) %C(bold blue)<%an>%Creset' --abbrev-commit --date=relative
 +
 +
[core]
 +
        excludesfile = /home/greg/.gitignore_global
 +
        editor = vim
 +
 +
[color]
 +
        ui = true
 +
 +
[credential]
 +
        helper = cache --timeout=3600
 +
 +
# ------------------ M E R G E -------------------------
 +
[merge]
 +
    tool = meld
 +
 +
[mergetool "meld"]
 +
    cmd = meld --auto-merge \"$LOCAL\" \"$BASE\" \"$REMOTE\" --output \"$MERGED\" --label \"MERGE (REMOTE BASE MY)\"
 +
    trustExitCode = false
 +
 +
[mergetool]
 +
    # don't ask if we want to skip merge
 +
    prompt = false
 +
 +
    # don't create backup *.orig files
 +
    keepBackup = false
 +
 +
# ------------------ D I F F -------------------------
 +
[diff]
 +
    guitool = meld
 +
 +
[difftool "meld"]
 +
    cmd = meld \"$LOCAL\" \"$REMOTE\" --label \"DIFF (Original v. Mine)\"
 +
 +
 +
[push]
 +
        default = simple
 +
[gitreview]
 +
        remote = origin
 +
[help]
 +
        format = web
 +
[web]
 +
#      browser = google-chrome
 +
        browser = firefox
 +
</source>
 +
 +
{{Highlight
 +
|text = If you want to browse the git help in your browser (as above), then make sure you <code>sudo apt-get install git-doc</code> to get the HTML files}}
 +
 +
== Decentralized Workflow and Branching Model ==
 +
Here's a good explanation on how most groups use Git in a successful branching model for development, "master", release branches, hotfixes, etc.
 +
http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/
 +
 +
 +
== Submodules ==
 +
Using multiple repositories to compose your project.  See https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Tools-Submodules
 +
 +
<source lang="bash">
 +
git init myproject
 +
cd myproject
 +
git submodule add git@github.com:example.com/htdocs.git website
 +
git submodule add https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/p/mediawiki/core.git mediawiki
 +
git submodule add https://gitlab.com/Aranad/tools.git odtools
 +
cd mediawiki/
 +
git checkout REL1_31
 +
cd ../
 +
git commit -m 'initial commit'
 +
git diff --submodule
 +
git config --global diff.submodule log
 +
git diff
 +
git config -f .gitmodules submodule.mediawiki.branch REL1_31
 +
git submodule update --remote
 +
git status
 +
git commit -am 'tracking REL1_31 in the mediawiki submodule'
 +
git config status.submodulesummary 1
 +
git log -p --submodule
 +
cd mediawiki/
 +
git submodule update --remote --merge
 +
git config alias.sdiff '!'"git diff && git submodule foreach 'git diff'"
 +
git config alias.spush 'push --recurse-submodules=on-demand'
 +
git config alias.supdate 'submodule update --remote --merge'
 +
</source>
 +
 
== Tools ==
 
== Tools ==
 
+
[[File:Meza.big.picture.pdf|thumb|Meza Big Picture|right]]
 
* http://git-scm.com/tools
 
* http://git-scm.com/tools
 
* http://github.com/guides/using-the-egit-eclipse-plugin-with-github
 
* http://github.com/guides/using-the-egit-eclipse-plugin-with-github
 +
* [https://github.com/esc/git-big-picture Git Big Picture] is a nice visualization tool that produces images like the one on the right.
 +
 +
== Reporting ==
 +
How many lines have I contributed since last year?
 +
<source lang="bash">
 +
git log --stat --author $(git config --get user.email) --since="last year" --until="last month" | awk -F',' '/files? changed/ {
 +
    files += $1
 +
    insertions += $2
 +
    deletions += $3
 +
    print
 +
}
 +
END {
 +
    print "Files Changed: " files
 +
    print "Insertions: " insertions
 +
    print "Deletions: " deletions
 +
    print "Lines changed: " insertions + deletions
 +
 +
}'
 +
</source>
 +
 +
== Visualizing ==
 +
There are a lot of ways to use the <code>git log</code> command to visualize your history. Everything from <code>git log --pretty=oneline</code> or <code>git log --graph --oneline</code> to <code>git log --graph --full-history --all --color --date=short --pretty=format:"%x1b[31m%h%x09%x1b[32m%d%x1b[0m%x20%ad %s"</code> which you probably want to put into your <code>~/.gitconfig</code> as some alias because who the heck is going to remember that one?<ref>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1838873/visualizing-branch-topology-in-git</ref>  Of course there are also many GUI clients.
  
 
== Documentation ==
 
== Documentation ==
 +
* http://wildlyinaccurate.com/a-hackers-guide-to-git Helpful intro because it doesn't pretend that Git is just like Subversion
 
* http://www.gitcasts.com GitCasts
 
* http://www.gitcasts.com GitCasts
 
* http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/everyday.html Everyday Git in 20 commands
 
* http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/everyday.html Everyday Git in 20 commands
Line 28: Line 171:
 
* http://git.or.cz/course/svn.html
 
* http://git.or.cz/course/svn.html
 
* http://software.complete.org/software/wiki/site/GitGuide Git Guide (short) at Software Complete.org
 
* http://software.complete.org/software/wiki/site/GitGuide Git Guide (short) at Software Complete.org
* http://book.git-scm.com/index.html
+
* '''http://git-scm.com/book/en/v2'''
 
* http://git-scm.com/documentation
 
* http://git-scm.com/documentation
 
* http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/user-manual.html
 
* http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/user-manual.html
Line 34: Line 177:
 
* http://github.com/guides/providing-your-ssh-key
 
* http://github.com/guides/providing-your-ssh-key
  
== Now what? ==
+
=== Git and Subversion ===
 +
* http://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-and-Other-Systems-Git-and-Subversion
 +
* http://viget.com/extend/effectively-using-git-with-subversion
 +
* http://trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/git-svn-tutorial
 +
* http://flavio.castelli.name/2007/09/04/howto_use_git_with_svn/
 +
 
 +
 
 +
== Background ==
 
I got into Git to make managing Drupal projects possible.  Now that we have a distributed VCS, we can actually collaborate in multiple ways (more than just a centralized model<ref>http://whygitisbetterthanx.com/#any-workflow</ref>), and we can work offline .  We can easily branch and merge.  We can pull in updates from the Drupal core maintainers.  We can pull in updates from the Drupal community (module maintainers).  We can track our own custom modules - especially if they are developed by more than one person.  We can branch, tag and deploy these combined sources to multiple instances (dev, staging, production) across multiple instances of Drupal (e.g. client projects that should share the exact same codebase) and have complete clarity on where each project stands regarding patches and security fixes or updates.  There have been several attempts in the Drupal community (credit to Moshe, Ben,<ref>http://drupal.org/node/197666</ref> Dries, et al.<ref>http://drupal.org/node/355154</ref>) to get this all working over the past year or so and I think we're finally seeing the tide turn in our favor.  Drupal may actually start to be "easy" to maintain and deploy.  Actually, the whole point is to BE up-to-date on all our projects.  This only happens when it is feasible.  Git makes it feasible.
 
I got into Git to make managing Drupal projects possible.  Now that we have a distributed VCS, we can actually collaborate in multiple ways (more than just a centralized model<ref>http://whygitisbetterthanx.com/#any-workflow</ref>), and we can work offline .  We can easily branch and merge.  We can pull in updates from the Drupal core maintainers.  We can pull in updates from the Drupal community (module maintainers).  We can track our own custom modules - especially if they are developed by more than one person.  We can branch, tag and deploy these combined sources to multiple instances (dev, staging, production) across multiple instances of Drupal (e.g. client projects that should share the exact same codebase) and have complete clarity on where each project stands regarding patches and security fixes or updates.  There have been several attempts in the Drupal community (credit to Moshe, Ben,<ref>http://drupal.org/node/197666</ref> Dries, et al.<ref>http://drupal.org/node/355154</ref>) to get this all working over the past year or so and I think we're finally seeing the tide turn in our favor.  Drupal may actually start to be "easy" to maintain and deploy.  Actually, the whole point is to BE up-to-date on all our projects.  This only happens when it is feasible.  Git makes it feasible.
 
* http://versioncontrolblog.com/2007/08/02/upgrading-drupal-52-with-git/
 
* http://versioncontrolblog.com/2007/08/02/upgrading-drupal-52-with-git/
Line 42: Line 192:
 
I pulled down the whole clone (which is only 26MB in size) of mikl's public history of Drupal in a few minutes.
 
I pulled down the whole clone (which is only 26MB in size) of mikl's public history of Drupal in a few minutes.
  
With Git is even possible to manage projects which are composites of multiple sources <ref>http://git.or.cz/gitwiki/GitSubmoduleTutorial</ref> (Ever tried that with Subversion's 'externals'? -- Don't bother to try it with Subversion because it just doesn't work!  Not only are externals feature poor, you'll still end up wanting to merge even more than before.  And as we know, merging is not a feature in Subversion.)
+
With Git, it is even possible to manage projects which are composites of multiple sources <ref>http://git.or.cz/gitwiki/GitSubmoduleTutorial</ref> (Ever tried that with Subversion's 'externals'? -- Don't bother to try it with Subversion because it just doesn't work!  Not only are externals feature poor, you'll still end up wanting to merge even more than before.  And as we know, merging is not a feature in Subversion.)
  
  
Line 65: Line 215:
 
Only in /var/www/drupal/sites: www.example.org
 
Only in /var/www/drupal/sites: www.example.org
 
</pre>
 
</pre>
== How it was done ==
+
 
 +
== Git Repo Hosting ==
 +
See [[Git repo hosting]]
 +
 
 +
== Building a Git server ==
 +
 
 +
(This recipe was from 2008.  It may still work, but ymmv)
  
 
Generally following the series of instructions at
 
Generally following the series of instructions at
 
http://vafer.org/blog/20080115011413  I installed Git-core, gitweb and gitosis on the  host
 
http://vafer.org/blog/20080115011413  I installed Git-core, gitweb and gitosis on the  host
<pre>
+
<source lang="bash">
 
# install git, the git-svn tool and the viewvc equivalent
 
# install git, the git-svn tool and the viewvc equivalent
 
apt-get install git-core git-svn gitweb
 
apt-get install git-core git-svn gitweb
Line 149: Line 305:
 
# and install it
 
# and install it
 
apt-get install gitosis
 
apt-get install gitosis
</pre>
+
</source>
 
 
== References ==
 
<references />
 
  
  
Line 180: Line 333:
 
* http://www.davidgrant.ca/maintaining_vendor_sources_with_subversion
 
* http://www.davidgrant.ca/maintaining_vendor_sources_with_subversion
 
* http://www.burtonini.com/blog/computers/svn-vendor-2005-05-04-13-55
 
* http://www.burtonini.com/blog/computers/svn-vendor-2005-05-04-13-55
 +
 +
{{References}}
  
 
[[Category:Tools]]
 
[[Category:Tools]]
Line 188: Line 343:
 
[[Category:Howto]]
 
[[Category:Howto]]
 
[[Category:Subversion]]
 
[[Category:Subversion]]
[[Category:SystemAdministration]]
+
[[Category:System Administration]]

Latest revision as of 12:02, 31 March 2020

The Git system (http://git-scm.com/) was originally developed by Linus Torvalds as a distributed version control system to replace BitKeeper for the Linux Kernel project

The bottom line is this: modern software development may take many "forms", but it usually boils down to this. Git enables such a branched workflow. That is why distributed version control in general, and git in particular, is the most widely adopted version control system for software development [1]

See Git/hacks for example commands

Intro to Git[edit | edit source]

Greg Rundlett setup git repository hosting services at the IIC (http://svn.iic.harvard.edu/gitweb/)

Why do we have git? Because Git is better than X Now that we have the "My DVCS is better than your DVCS" argument out of the way, you can actually get some valuable insights from that website if you are interested in comparing Git with Mercurial, Bazaar, Subversion or Perforce. If I had to single out one primary advantage of Git, it would be that it actually features branching and merging.

Repo visibility is completely customizable, as are individual permissions to write to repos. I've installed a system called gitosis to handle the privileges through a special git repository. It uses Public Key cryptography rather than granting SSH accounts to everyone. This makes it really easy to do your work securely without even needing a password. For the curious, the actual mechanics of gitosis are detailed at scie.nti.st. Although that link may still work, there is also https://git-scm.com/book/en/v1/Git-on-the-Server-Gitosis.

You can actually host your own private repository on any server that you have access to. To collaborate with your peers, export a bare repo [2] and use SSH keys. more

To host a public repo, go to http://github.com

You might want to read about how we migrate from Subversion to Git or how others have done it

Initial Configuration[edit | edit source]

In your first time setting up Git on a new computer, you want to configure your username and email among other settings.

git config --global user.name "Greg Rundlett"
git config --global user.email greg@freephile.com
git config --global core.editor vim
git config --global diff.tool meld
git config --global --add color.ui true
# store password in memory for an hour
git config --global credential.helper 'cache --timeout=3600'


# recent packaged versions of git might be 1.8.3.1 (CentOS 7.4) whereas the current available is 2.15.1
# push.default is unset; its implicit value is changing in
# Git 2.0 from 'matching' to 'simple'. To squelch this message
# and adopt the new behavior now, use:
git config --global push.default simple

Example .gitconfig[edit | edit source]

git config --global -e and paste in the following:

[user]
        name = Greg Rundlett
        email = greg@freephile.com

[alias]
        co = checkout
        ci = commit
        unstage = reset HEAD
        wu = log --stat origin..@{0}
        wup = log -p origin..@{0}
        lg = log --graph --pretty=format:'%Cred%h%Creset -%C(yellow)%d%Creset %s %Cgreen(%cr) %C(bold blue)<%an>%Creset' --abbrev-commit --date=relative

[core]
        excludesfile = /home/greg/.gitignore_global
        editor = vim

[color]
        ui = true

[credential]
        helper = cache --timeout=3600

# ------------------ M E R G E -------------------------
[merge]
    tool = meld

[mergetool "meld"]
    cmd = meld --auto-merge \"$LOCAL\" \"$BASE\" \"$REMOTE\" --output \"$MERGED\" --label \"MERGE (REMOTE BASE MY)\"
    trustExitCode = false

[mergetool]
    # don't ask if we want to skip merge
    prompt = false

    # don't create backup *.orig files
    keepBackup = false

# ------------------ D I F F -------------------------
[diff]
    guitool = meld

[difftool "meld"]
    cmd = meld \"$LOCAL\" \"$REMOTE\" --label \"DIFF (Original v. Mine)\"


[push]
        default = simple
[gitreview]
        remote = origin
[help]
        format = web
[web]
#       browser = google-chrome
        browser = firefox


Decentralized Workflow and Branching Model[edit | edit source]

Here's a good explanation on how most groups use Git in a successful branching model for development, "master", release branches, hotfixes, etc. http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/


Submodules[edit | edit source]

Using multiple repositories to compose your project. See https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Tools-Submodules

git init myproject
cd myproject
git submodule add git@github.com:example.com/htdocs.git website
git submodule add https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/p/mediawiki/core.git mediawiki
git submodule add https://gitlab.com/Aranad/tools.git odtools
cd mediawiki/
git checkout REL1_31
cd ../
git commit -m 'initial commit'
git diff --submodule
git config --global diff.submodule log
git diff
git config -f .gitmodules submodule.mediawiki.branch REL1_31
git submodule update --remote
git status
git commit -am 'tracking REL1_31 in the mediawiki submodule'
git config status.submodulesummary 1
git log -p --submodule
cd mediawiki/
git submodule update --remote --merge
git config alias.sdiff '!'"git diff && git submodule foreach 'git diff'" 
git config alias.spush 'push --recurse-submodules=on-demand'
git config alias.supdate 'submodule update --remote --merge'

Tools[edit | edit source]

Meza Big Picture

Reporting[edit | edit source]

How many lines have I contributed since last year?

git log --stat --author $(git config --get user.email) --since="last year" --until="last month" | awk -F',' '/files? changed/ {
    files += $1
    insertions += $2
    deletions += $3
    print
}
END {
    print "Files Changed: " files
    print "Insertions: " insertions
    print "Deletions: " deletions
    print "Lines changed: " insertions + deletions

}'

Visualizing[edit | edit source]

There are a lot of ways to use the git log command to visualize your history. Everything from git log --pretty=oneline or git log --graph --oneline to git log --graph --full-history --all --color --date=short --pretty=format:"%x1b[31m%h%x09%x1b[32m%d%x1b[0m%x20%ad %s" which you probably want to put into your ~/.gitconfig as some alias because who the heck is going to remember that one?[3] Of course there are also many GUI clients.

Documentation[edit | edit source]

Git and Subversion[edit | edit source]


Background[edit | edit source]

I got into Git to make managing Drupal projects possible. Now that we have a distributed VCS, we can actually collaborate in multiple ways (more than just a centralized model[4]), and we can work offline . We can easily branch and merge. We can pull in updates from the Drupal core maintainers. We can pull in updates from the Drupal community (module maintainers). We can track our own custom modules - especially if they are developed by more than one person. We can branch, tag and deploy these combined sources to multiple instances (dev, staging, production) across multiple instances of Drupal (e.g. client projects that should share the exact same codebase) and have complete clarity on where each project stands regarding patches and security fixes or updates. There have been several attempts in the Drupal community (credit to Moshe, Ben,[5] Dries, et al.[6]) to get this all working over the past year or so and I think we're finally seeing the tide turn in our favor. Drupal may actually start to be "easy" to maintain and deploy. Actually, the whole point is to BE up-to-date on all our projects. This only happens when it is feasible. Git makes it feasible.

I pulled down the whole clone (which is only 26MB in size) of mikl's public history of Drupal in a few minutes.

With Git, it is even possible to manage projects which are composites of multiple sources [7] (Ever tried that with Subversion's 'externals'? -- Don't bother to try it with Subversion because it just doesn't work! Not only are externals feature poor, you'll still end up wanting to merge even more than before. And as we know, merging is not a feature in Subversion.)


Comparisons of Branches, sources etc.[edit | edit source]

When comparing large trees of files, you need a good set of tools to be able to filter out noise. Normally KDiff3 is very good at this. However, KDiff3 is not available yet as a package for Ubuntu. If you compile it from source, I still found that the most important feature -- the preprocessor -- would not work if more than one command were piped together.

Specifically, I couldn't use this preprocessor setting which worked great for me in the past: sed "s/\$\(Id\|Revision\|Author\|Log\|Header\|Date\).*\$/\$\1\$/" | sed "s#/\* vim: set.*#/* vim: set ... */#" | sed "s/^.*opyright.*$/Copyright Greg Rundlett :-)/"

Without the benefit of a good preprocessor, KDiff would falsely tell me that there were 1,523 files which differed between DRUPAL-6-9 and DRUPAL-6-10

Kompare seemed hard to configure, and Meld didn't apply the pre-processor to directory compares. So, I used the command-line version of diff:
greg@greg-linux:~/work/git/drupal$ diff -r --exclude=.git --exclude=.svn --brief --ignore-matching-lines="$Id" . /var/www/drupal/

Only in /var/www/drupal/: favicon.ico
Only in /var/www/drupal/sites/all: modules
Only in /var/www/drupal/sites/all: themes
Only in /var/www/drupal/sites: dev.example.org
Only in /var/www/drupal/sites: example.org
Only in /var/www/drupal/sites: localhost
Only in /var/www/drupal/sites: prod.example.org
Only in /var/www/drupal/sites: www.example.org

Git Repo Hosting[edit | edit source]

See Git repo hosting

Building a Git server[edit | edit source]

(This recipe was from 2008. It may still work, but ymmv)

Generally following the series of instructions at http://vafer.org/blog/20080115011413 I installed Git-core, gitweb and gitosis on the host

# install git, the git-svn tool and the viewvc equivalent
apt-get install git-core git-svn gitweb

# run the git-daemon - a really simple server for git repositories
sudo -u git git-daemon --reuseaddr --verbose --base-path=/home/git/repositories/ --detach

# create a service that starts when the machine starts
cat > /etc/init.d/git-daemon << EOF
#!/bin/sh

test -f /usr/bin/git-daemon || exit 0

. /lib/lsb/init-functions

GITDAEMON_OPTIONS="--reuseaddr --verbose --base-path=/home/git/repositories/ --detach"

case "$1" in
start)  log_daemon_msg "Starting git-daemon"

start-stop-daemon --start -c git:git --quiet --background \
--exec /usr/bin/git-daemon -- ${GITDAEMON_OPTIONS}

log_end_msg $?
;;
stop)   log_daemon_msg "Stopping git-daemon"

start-stop-daemon --stop --quiet --name git-daemon

log_end_msg $?
;;
*)      log_action_msg "Usage: /etc/init.d/git-daemon {start|stop}"
exit 2
;;
esac
exit 0
EOF

# and add it to the various run-levels
update-rc.d git-daemon defaults

# setup the configuration of the gitweb repository browser
vi /etc/gitweb.conf

# Add cgi capabilities to our "Version Control" host
vi /etc/apache2/sites-available/git

# check the syntax of our apache configuration
apache2ctl configtest

# oops, the mod_rewrite isn't enabled
a2enmod rewrite

# check syntax and errors again
apache2ctl configtest

# restart apache
/etc/init.d/apache2 restart

# see what may have been added to the web docroot
ls /var/www/

# check to see that gitweb is installed
# and see what files it installs since they aren't in /var/www
dpkg --status gitweb
dpkg --listfiles gitweb

# create a symbolic link between the gitweb software and the repository root where we'll be viewing it.
ln -s /usr/share/gitweb /home/git/

# see what we have so far
ls /home/git/

# setup our gitweb configuration
vi /etc/gitweb.conf

# check if gitosis is packaged for ubuntu
apt-cache search gitosis
# and install it
apt-get install gitosis


Rant[edit | edit source]

quote 
After replacing the 1.0 code with 1.1 code, svn status will show files with local modifications as well as, perhaps, some unversioned files. If we did what we were supposed to do, the unversioned files are only those new files introduced in the 1.1 release of libcomplex--we run svn add on those to get them under version control. If the 1.1 code no longer has certain files that were in the 1.0 tree, it may be hard to notice them; you'd have to compare the two trees with some external tool and then svn delete any files present in 1.0 but not in 1.1. (Although it might also be just fine to let these same files live on in unused obscurity!) Finally, once our current working copy contains only the libcomplex 1.1 code, we commit the changes we made to get it looking that way. [8]

So, according to the official Subversion manual, the right way to track source code that you build on, you should

  1. download an export (they don't even consider that your vendor should be and IS using a VCS)
  2. add stuff that they added
  3. launch external tools to find out if there were deletions
  4. or just ignore deletions (tell me why we're using source code managment tools?)
  5. commit those changes

They admit that this is not exactly what you would like: "...things can quickly degrade into a situation where we have to manually re-create our customizations in the new version."

The official manual continues: "Vendor drops that contain more than a few deletes, additions, and moves complicate the process of upgrading to each successive version of the third-party data. So Subversion supplies the svn_load_dirs.pl script to assist with this process."

Except that svn_load_dirs.pl does not come with Subversion [9], and even if it did, it has limited or zero capabilities to handle and TRACK the status, history, and provenance of your source code. In any situation where a conflict arises, svn_load_dirs.pl will ask YOU to figure it out -- without any supporting details. Despite what the quote from the manual implies, the actual README with svn_load_dirs.pl says that it should NOT be used with sources that come from another VCS... those imports should be scripted ala cvs2svn etc.

I don't recommend looking at these, you'll just learn how NOT to do things. But here are examples of others who have needlessly fought with Subversion to manage their Drupal sites and source code

References[edit source]