Difference between revisions of "Version control"
(New page: == Comparing VCS == [http://changelog.complete.org/posts/528-Whose-Distributed-VCS-Is-The-Most-Distributed.html A comparison of some of the open source distributed Version Control Systems]...) |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
; [[wp:Git_%28software%29|git]] | ; [[wp:Git_%28software%29|git]] | ||
:created by Linux Torvalds as an open source replacement for BitKeeper, and appease Alan Cox and Richard Stallman. | :created by Linux Torvalds as an open source replacement for BitKeeper, and appease Alan Cox and Richard Stallman. | ||
| − | ; Mercurial | + | ; [[wp:Mercurial_(software)|Mercurial]] |
; svk | ; svk | ||
: this project is now run by Best Practical - the makers of RT | : this project is now run by Best Practical - the makers of RT | ||
Revision as of 21:09, 20 October 2008
Comparing VCS[edit | edit source]
A comparison of some of the open source distributed Version Control Systems.
Not sure why SVN was included in this comparison, since SVN is NOT a distributed VCS. However, there is a wrapper around SVN (called SVK) that adds distributed features if you want to move to a distributed model but still retain SVN repos at the core.
Distributed v. Centralized VCS[edit | edit source]
Linus really emphasizes Distributed Version Control Systems (video) and thinks anything else is insane, brain damaged, ugly and stupid).
Obviously centralized systems have been used for years, but one of the many points he makes is that centralized systems only work well in a tightly controlled environment in a single location. Linus did something to meet his needs: he created GIT
Distributed VCS[edit | edit source]
There is wp:BitKeeper but that is a commercial product
