MediaWiki v Confluence: Difference between revisions

Line 1:

== Comparison Chart ==

{| class="wikitable sortable"

Line 36:

Line 35:

| {{checkmark|no}}

| <abbr title="A logical falacy that leads audiences towards a false conclusion">This is a red herring</abbr>. There is no way that MediaWiki would ever be listed by Gartner since they review '''vendors'''. MediaWiki is produced by the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF), a non-profit foundation. They are not a software vendor. They'll never be listed by Gartner in any MQ unless Gartner changes their methodology. <ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_Quadrant#Criticism</ref> Besides, Atlassian was named in the 2017 MQ for "Enterprise Agile Planning Tools", not for wikis, not for collaboration, not for knowledge management.

| <abbr title="A logical falacy that leads audiences towards a false conclusion">This is a red herring</abbr>. There is no way that MediaWiki would ever be listed by Gartner since they review '''vendors'''. MediaWiki is produced by the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF), a non-profit foundation. They are not a software vendor. They'll never be listed by Gartner in any MQ unless Gartner changes their methodology. <ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_Quadrant#Criticism</ref> Besides, Atlassian was named in the 2017 MQ for "Enterprise Agile Planning Tools" <ref>https://www.atlassian.com/gartner</ref>, not for wikis, not for collaboration, not for knowledge management.

|-

! Cost

Line 65:

Line 64:

== Users ==

Let's see who uses MediaWiki

Just about every established open source software project has a wiki.

* Some like Open EMR even [http://www.open-emr.org/wiki/index.php/How_to_Document_Your_Code_Properly use MediaWiki to document how to document their code]

~~Let's see who uses MediaWiki http://www.open-emr.org/wiki/index.php/How_to_Document_Your_Code_Properly~~

[[Category:QualityBox]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Comparison Chart ==
 {| class="wikitable sortable"
@@ Line 36: / Line 35: @@
 | {{checkmark|no}}
 | {{checkmark|no}}
-| <abbr title="A logical falacy that leads audiences towards a false conclusion">This is a red herring</abbr>. There is no way that MediaWiki would ever be listed by Gartner since they review '''vendors'''. MediaWiki is produced by the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF), a non-profit foundation.  They are not a software vendor. They'll never be listed by Gartner in any MQ unless Gartner changes their methodology. <ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_Quadrant#Criticism</ref>  Besides, Atlassian was named in the 2017 MQ for "Enterprise Agile Planning Tools", not for wikis, not for collaboration, not for knowledge management.
+| <abbr title="A logical falacy that leads audiences towards a false conclusion">This is a red herring</abbr>. There is no way that MediaWiki would ever be listed by Gartner since they review '''vendors'''. MediaWiki is produced by the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF), a non-profit foundation.  They are not a software vendor. They'll never be listed by Gartner in any MQ unless Gartner changes their methodology. <ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_Quadrant#Criticism</ref>  Besides, Atlassian was named in the 2017 MQ for "Enterprise Agile Planning Tools" <ref>https://www.atlassian.com/gartner</ref>, not for wikis, not for collaboration, not for knowledge management.
 |-
 ! Cost
@@ Line 65: / Line 64: @@
+== Users ==
+Let's see who uses MediaWiki
+Just about every established open source software project has a wiki.
+* Some like Open EMR even [http://www.open-emr.org/wiki/index.php/How_to_Document_Your_Code_Properly use MediaWiki to document how to document their code]
-Let's see who uses MediaWiki http://www.open-emr.org/wiki/index.php/How_to_Document_Your_Code_Properly
+{{References}}
 [[Category:QualityBox]]