Static site generator: Difference between revisions
m typo |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
== Performance == | == Performance == | ||
For us, we wanted to create a marketing site for a new product, and didn't need the complexity of a full framework or CMS. And we didn't want to get bogged down in the complexity either. Whereas our regular [[Drupal]] website takes an astonishingly bad 5 seconds to load (we'll improve it... "The cobbler's kids always need shoes"), our '''documentation site for QualityBox loads in 0.664s''' | For us, we wanted to create a marketing site for a new product, and didn't need the complexity of a full framework or CMS. And we didn't want to get bogged down in the complexity either. Whereas our regular [[Drupal]] website takes an astonishingly bad 5 seconds to load (we'll improve it... "The cobbler's kids always need shoes"), our '''documentation site for QualityBox loads in 0.664s''' | ||
{{References}} | {{References}} | ||
[[Category:Performance]] | [[Category:Performance]] | ||