Gnu social: Difference between revisions

Adds link to commentary about GNU Social; adds rationale for choosing freedom
Line 1: Line 1:
[https://gnu.io/ GNU Social] is like [https://diasporafoundation.org/ Diaspora], Friendica, and [http://pump.io/ Pump.IO] <ref>https://microca.st/freephile</ref>. GNU Social is a federated social network that you can install on your own server.  There are many [http://federation.skilledtests.com/List_of_Independent_GNU_social_Instances.html instances] of GNU Social software.  The local one, run by Joshua Judson Rosen is https://NHCrossing.com.
[https://gnu.io/ GNU Social] is like [https://diasporafoundation.org/ Diaspora], Friendica, and [http://pump.io/ Pump.IO] <ref>https://microca.st/freephile</ref>. GNU Social is a federated social network that you can install on your own server.  There are many [http://federation.skilledtests.com/List_of_Independent_GNU_social_Instances.html instances] of GNU Social software.  The local one, run by Joshua Judson Rosen is https://NHCrossing.com.
== Choosing Freedom ==
Some interesting discussion on [https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11062757 GNU Social, a FLOSS alternative to Twitter]  The short takeaway from that discussion, and in general, is that if you join or host a freedom respecting federated platform (e.g. NHCrossing.com - an instance of GNU Social), then you both '''control''' your content; and can '''syndicate''' your content to other centralized services like Twitter.  The benefits are many, but it can be summarized as: you gain freedom while also not suffering from lack of visibility or participation in those centralized corporate services.


{{References}}
{{References}}