Load balancer: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(Created page with "HAProxy is a good load balancer. AWS "Elastic Load Balancer" (ELB) - now called 'Classic Load Balancer' is not so capable. But it does cost a lot, so there's that feature ;-...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
HAProxy is a good load balancer.
== HAProxy ==
'''High Availability Proxy''' (HAProxy) is a good load balancer. Here you can read the docs about [https://www.haproxy.com/doc/aloha/7.0/haproxy/tls.html HAProxy support for TLS] and the community docs at https://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/1.6/configuration.html#2.1  Read more at https://haproxy.org


== NGINX ==
NGINX is also a good load balancer.  Check [https://www.nginx.com/blog/aws-alb-vs-nginx-plus/ this comparison]  I know 'feature lists' made by the vendor tend to put a lot of gloss on their own products, but this is a fair comparison.
== Other ==
AWS "Elastic Load Balancer" (ELB) - now called 'Classic Load Balancer' is not so capable.  But it does cost a lot, so there's that feature ;-)
AWS "Elastic Load Balancer" (ELB) - now called 'Classic Load Balancer' is not so capable.  But it does cost a lot, so there's that feature ;-)
NGINX is also a good load balancer.  Check [https://www.nginx.com/blog/aws-alb-vs-nginx-plus/ this comparison]  I know 'feature lists' made by the vendor tend to put a lot of gloss on their own products, but this is a fair comparison.


[[Category:System Architecture]]
[[Category:System Architecture]]
4,558

edits