Version control

From Freephile Wiki
Revision as of 21:03, 20 October 2008 by Freephile (talk | contribs) (New page: == Comparing VCS == [http://changelog.complete.org/posts/528-Whose-Distributed-VCS-Is-The-Most-Distributed.html A comparison of some of the open source distributed Version Control Systems]...)

(diff) ← Older revision | Approved revision (diff) | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Comparing VCS[edit | edit source]

A comparison of some of the open source distributed Version Control Systems.

Not sure why SVN was included in this comparison, since SVN is NOT a distributed VCS. However, there is a wrapper around SVN (called SVK) that adds distributed features if you want to move to a distributed model but still retain SVN repos at the core.

Distributed v. Centralized VCS[edit | edit source]

Linus really emphasizes Distributed Version Control Systems (video) and thinks anything else is insane, brain damaged, ugly and stupid).

Obviously centralized systems have been used for years, but one of the many points he makes is that centralized systems only work well in a tightly controlled environment in a single location. Linus did something to meet his needs: he created GIT

Distributed VCS[edit | edit source]

There is wp:BitKeeper but that is a commercial product

git
created by Linux Torvalds as an open source replacement for BitKeeper, and appease Alan Cox and Richard Stallman.
Mercurial
svk
this project is now run by Best Practical - the makers of RT