Bureaucrats, confirmed, Administrators
4,558
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Special:Badtitle/NS100:QualityBox (view source)
Revision as of 06:57, 18 October 2016
, 06:57, 18 October 2016adding more tasks
# {{AI}} Make sure the mail system is working (add extra configuration for MediaWiki <ref>https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:$wgSMTP</ref> to tie in with clients mail system?) or set this up as a hosting feature with SendGrid/et al. <ref>[[Private:Email_Marketing]]</ref> as the underlying service shared by all domains on a plan
# {{AI}} Create website similar to https://fantasktic.com
# {{AI}} Get rid of '''EMPTY_WIKI_NAME''' in group_vars/all/config... what is it for? I assume it's some kind of chicken and egg thing, but I don't think we need it.
# {{AI}} Add support for separating wiki host from db host. See https://gist.github.com/halberom/0663ef9933360fcf7141 for gist on how to use 'gather_facts' on one group of hosts (e.g. db servers) to fill out a template for another set of hosts (web servers).
# {{AI}} replace usage of '''MYSQL_WIKI_PASSWORD''' with actual random password; or user supplied password (found in ./roles/install_mediawiki and ./roles/create_new_wiki_on_db_host)
=== SPL Project ===
# Add DNSMasq (or equivalent) http://www.nickhammond.com/vagrant-and-ansible-for-local-development/ https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Dnsmasq to make resolver easier for .dev or .local domains
# Add Docker option https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/intro_inventory.html#non-ssh-connection-types although the images provided by docker would need heavy customization, so the case for doing this is not yet clear. Perhaps a service option where 'sandbox' was the service tier would make sense however if it didn't contain the differentiating factors that make QualityBox attractive, then how would the sandbox sell the service?
# create the distinction between creating a db host and web host (e.g. remove 'install apache' from the qualitybox role)
== Subpages ==
