Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
 
== Comparison Chart ==
{| class="wikitable sortable"
| {{checkmark|no}}
| {{checkmark|no}}
| <abbr title="A logical falacy that leads audiences towards a false conclusion">This is a red herring</abbr>. There is no way that MediaWiki would ever be listed by Gartner since they review '''vendors'''. MediaWiki is produced by the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF), a non-profit foundation. They are not a software vendor. They'll never be listed by Gartner in any MQ unless Gartner changes their methodology. <ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_Quadrant#Criticism</ref> Besides, Atlassian was named in the 2017 MQ for "Enterprise Agile Planning Tools"<ref>https://www.atlassian.com/gartner</ref>, not for wikis, not for collaboration, not for knowledge management.
|-
! Cost
== Users ==
Let's see who uses MediaWiki
 
Just about every established open source software project has a wiki.
* Some like Open EMR even [http://www.open-emr.org/wiki/index.php/How_to_Document_Your_Code_Properly use MediaWiki to document how to document their code]
Let's see who uses MediaWiki http://www.open-emr.org/wiki/index.php/How_to_Document_Your_Code_Properly{{References}}
[[Category:QualityBox]]
4,558

edits

Navigation menu