Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
155 bytes added ,  12:57, 3 March 2015
Adds links
There is [http://www.iheavy.com/2014/01/16/how-to-deploy-on-amazon-ec2-with-vagrant/ this article] that explains how to do this, but I didn't want to create a separate VagrantFile. After not succeeding, I should probably go back and try that approach.
Using multiple [http://docs.vagrantup.com/v2/plugins/providers .html providers] (AWS, Rackspace, VirtualBox, VMWare) ''with the same virtual machine'' is not a feature of Vagrant. Supposedly this limitation will be removed in a future version of Vagrant. But there is a work-around that you can use to accomplish this -- by creating a multi-machine environment. We are describing that work-around. There are some "cheap" solutions that tell you to either delete, or rename the hidden <code>.virtualbox</code> directory in your project source. Don't do that. That's just deleting the information that you'd need for using the existing provider. Or, only do that if you are trying to permanently switch the provider used in your project -- which is not the case here. To get a fully compatible MediaWiki-Vagrant setup that works for both localhost VirtualBox deployments and cloud Amazon AWS deployments, then read on.
=== Caveats ===
The MediaWiki-Vagrant setup is designed for local development and NOT for security, so it may not be suitable for running in the cloud.
The MediaWiki-Vagrant box is setup with NFS shares. The Vagrant-aws plugin has nominal support for shared folders using rsync, so sharing the ~/vagrant folder might work, but it's unkown how well this works. And it's unknown exactly how to disable the sharing [http://docs.vagrantup.com/v2/synced-folders/basic_usage.html synced folders] in <code>Vagrantfile-extra.rb</code>that is defined in the Vagrantfile
=== Pre-requisites ===
== Resources ==
[[ https://github.com/mitchellh/vagrant/issues/2733 | This is the official 'response' ]] to this issue. It offers a [[ https://gist.github.com/maxlinc/8c64c5e93734a3c939b8 | gist ]] that supposedly addresses the problem of running multiple providers, but I wasn't able to figure out how to apply that to the MediaWiki-Vagrant setup.
There is a somewhat related issue in Phabricator that requests a web front-end to make deployment easier.
4,558

edits

Navigation menu