Difference between revisions of "Creative Commons"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(adds case study) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | [[File:Creative_commons_license_spectrum.svg| | + | [[File:Creative_commons_license_spectrum.svg|frame|right|link=wp:Creative Commons license]] |
For creative works and documentation, it is best to use a [[wp:Creative Commons license]] license for your work. There is the GNU Free Documentation License, but that license is not better than a CC0 or CC-BY or CC-SA license, perhaps more difficult to apply to source code examples, and not more popular. | For creative works and documentation, it is best to use a [[wp:Creative Commons license]] license for your work. There is the GNU Free Documentation License, but that license is not better than a CC0 or CC-BY or CC-SA license, perhaps more difficult to apply to source code examples, and not more popular. | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
== Watch == | == Watch == | ||
https://creativecommons.org/videos/wanna-work-together/ | https://creativecommons.org/videos/wanna-work-together/ | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− |
Revision as of 17:50, 5 April 2016
For creative works and documentation, it is best to use a wp:Creative Commons license license for your work. There is the GNU Free Documentation License, but that license is not better than a CC0 or CC-BY or CC-SA license, perhaps more difficult to apply to source code examples, and not more popular.
The Creative Commons set of licenses are used to support Free Cultural Works.
Applying the Creative Commons[edit | edit source]
- especially with data
- https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/Data
- https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/Marking_your_work_with_a_CC_license#Example:_Dataset