Creative Commons: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
adds case study
 
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Creative_commons_license_spectrum.svg|frame|right|link=wp:Creative Commons license]]
[[File:Creative_commons_license_spectrum.svg|thumb|right|300px|link=wp:Creative Commons license]]
For creative works and documentation, it is best to use a [[wp:Creative Commons license]] license for your work.  There is the GNU Free Documentation License, but that license is not better than a CC0 or CC-BY or CC-SA license, perhaps more difficult to apply to source code examples, and not more popular.  
For creative works and documentation, it is best to use a [[wp:Creative Commons license]] license for your work.  There is the GNU Free Documentation License, but that license is not better than a CC0 or CC-BY or CC-SA license, perhaps more difficult to apply to source code examples, and not more popular.  


Line 13: Line 13:
== Watch ==
== Watch ==
https://creativecommons.org/videos/wanna-work-together/
https://creativecommons.org/videos/wanna-work-together/
== Case Study ==
https://knowledge.autodesk.com/sites/all/themes/autodesk_foundation5/images/standard/logo.png Autodesk is a major software company.  Their 'Customer Support' [https://knowledge.autodesk.com/ Knowledge Network] website runs on [[Drupal]] while the content is licensed under a CC license.  See https://knowledge.autodesk.com/customer-service/share-the-knowledge